After reading a post on MarkyMark's blog, I have become aware of a term that has entered the vernacular of a few MRAs. It's called "Marriage 2.0." Basically, it serves as an umbrella designation for everything that is wrong with marriage today in terms of what it offers (or fails to offer) men. For examples, see here, here, and here. I like it. It separates the wheat from the chaff. Already, I am thinking of examples of how to use it ...
"Churches are trying to shame men into Marriage 2.0."
"Marriage 2.0 is not a part of manhood."
"Just how do men benefit from Marriage 2.0 anyway?"
"God ordained marriage, but I doubt he ordained Marriage 2.0."
The above are just a few possible examples of what I might say. You have been forwarned. ;-)
#TeamAbigail: “Your Baby Lived, God is Good”
2 days ago